ALBAWABA - Concerns about a potential direct conflict with Iran have increased as a result of the United States' greatest military deployment to the Middle East since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Financial Times reported.
According to the source, even as indirect diplomatic negotiations with Tehran continue in Geneva, Washington has gathered sufficient forces to support prolonged air operations that will last many weeks. The size and speed of the mobilization were compared by former U.S. officials to the planning that went into the Iraq War.
The Pentagon has sent the most substantial reinforcement in more than 20 years to the area, according to parallel reports from The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times. These forces have sent advanced stealth fighter jets, command and support aircraft, air defense systems, and two aircraft carrier strike groups.
Strategic pressure and ultimatum
The military buildup comes as U.S. President Donald Trump has warned that failing to make a deal could have dire repercussions and has reportedly offered Iran a 15-day window to do so.
The Financial Times quoted defense specialists who stated that the quick buildup raises the possibility of military action, particularly considering the concentration of airpower and logistical support capabilities. During the deployment, the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford will be positioned beside the USS Abraham Lincoln close to Oman, along with dozens of aerial refueling tankers and heavy transport planes.
Danger of Inaccurate Calculations
Because such a large commitment in military resources may make Washington less likely to make small diplomatic compromises, experts cautioned that the size of the mobilization increases the risk of miscalculation.
Tensions in the region are reportedly rising as satellite imagery purports to show Iran bolstering defenses around strategic nuclear sites and holding naval exercises with Russia.
There is also doubt on whether the current deployment is a high-pressure negotiating strategy or a show of readiness for more extensive military action, even if nuclear talks are still ongoing.
The Financial Times came to the conclusion that whether the buildup is meant to be leverage or the beginning of a possible war will be determined in the upcoming weeks.
